-
Join 230 other subscribers
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Fiduciary Prudence Protocols: Proactive Fiduciary Risk Mitigation Strategies For Plan Sponsors and Other Investment Fiduciaries
- Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence, Part I: Artificial Intelligence as a Fiduciary Risk/Liability Mitigation Tool Under ERISA
- May It Please the Court: Closing Argument On Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure Under ERISA Section 404(a) and Section 78(3) of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts
- Who’s Overseeing the DOL and EBSA? DOL FAB 2026-01’s Fatal Flaw Is Actually a Fiduciary Trap for Unwary Plan Sponsors
- May It Please The Court: THE EBSA’s Legally Unsupported, Unfounded, and Bootstrapped Policies Create a Systemic Threat to Plan Participants and Plan Sponsors Alike and Must Be Rejected
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 230 other subscribers
Category Archives: fiduciary compliance
Fiduciary Prudence Protocols: Proactive Fiduciary Risk Mitigation Strategies For Plan Sponsors and Other Investment Fiduciaries
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC These protocols synthesize the fiduciary standards reflected in Supreme Court ERISA decisions and the Restatement (Third) of Trusts. 1. Loyalty Protocol Every decision must be made solely in the interest of … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, compliance, ERISA, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary risk management
1 Comment
Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence, Part I: Artificial Intelligence as a Fiduciary Risk/Liability Mitigation Tool Under ERISA
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC May It Please the Court: The question before this Court is not whether artificial intelligence should replace fiduciary judgment. It should not. The question is whether fiduciaries acting under the prudent … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Tagged 401k, AI, artificial intelligence, ERISA, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, technology
Leave a comment
May It Please the Court: Closing Argument On Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure Under ERISA Section 404(a) and Section 78(3) of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC May it please the Court: This case concerns a fundamental proposition that predates ERISA, predates modern securities law, and lies at the very heart of the law of trusts: a fiduciary … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Leave a comment
Who’s Overseeing the DOL and EBSA? DOL FAB 2026-01’s Fatal Flaw Is Actually a Fiduciary Trap for Unwary Plan Sponsors
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC APPELLATE CLOSING ARGUMENT OPPOSING FAB 2026-01 May it please the Court: At its core, this case presents a simple but critically consequential question: Can the Department of Labor lawfully encourage fiduciaries … Continue reading
May It Please The Court: THE EBSA’s Legally Unsupported, Unfounded, and Bootstrapped Policies Create a Systemic Threat to Plan Participants and Plan Sponsors Alike and Must Be Rejected
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC The issue before this Court is not whether procedural prudence matters under ERISA. It unquestionably does. The issue is whether the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) may lawfully transform procedural prudence … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Tagged compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, Fiduciary litigation
Leave a comment
A Call for Senate Oversight Hearings: The Systemic Risk to Plan Sponsors and Plan Participants Created by the EBSA’s Expansive and Legally Unsupported Extrapolations of ERISA Fiduciary Principles
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC Employee Benefits Security Administration (“EBSA”) may not transform generally accepted fiduciary concepts into categorical legal mandates untethered from statutory text, judicial precedent, or established trust-law principles. This appeal presents a fundamental … Continue reading
DOL/EBSA Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-01 Is Not Entitled to Judicial Deference Under The Loper Bright Decision
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC In DOL/EBSA Field Assitance Bulletin 2026-01 (FAB 2026-01), the Department of Labor states its belief that its proposed legislation is entitled to legal deference. Nothing could be further from the truth. … Continue reading
Fatally Flawed: Why DOL Administrative Bulletin 2026-01 Will Not, and Should Not, Withstand Judicial Scrutiny
ERISA
fiduciary litigation
fiduciary liability
404a
plan sponsor
401k
EBSA
DOL Bulletin 2026-01 Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Tagged 401k, compliance, Congresss, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability
Leave a comment
Terminal Wealth: The True Fiduciary Prudence Paradigm with Regard to the In-Plan Annuity Scam
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC A sound evaluation of fiduciary prudence must ultimately be anchored in outcomes, not just process—and in the context of long-term financial decision-making, the most meaningful outcome is terminal wealth. Fiduciaries are … Continue reading
Is the DOL/EBSA Trying to Serve Two Masters? ERISA Section 404(a)’s Independent Investigation and Evaluation Requirements and the DOL/EBSA Proposed Rule on Alternative Investments
Is the DOL and EBSA trying to Serve Two Masters? The DOL’s proposed rule for alyternative investments suggests the answer is “yes,” given the known lack of transparency associaes with such products. Worse yet, it has been suggested that alternative … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Tagged 401k, ERISA, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciarylitigation, plansponsor, retirement plans
Leave a comment
The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules 
You must be logged in to post a comment.