Tag Archives: Fiduciary prudence

Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence: In-Plan Annuities, Terminal Wealth, and the Terminal Wealth Breakeven Value Index

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC Jonathan Clements was a well-respected financial writer for the Wall Street Journal. In 2005, he wrote an article about equity indexed annuities, nka fixed indexed annuities, entitled “Why Big Insurers Are … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance, fiduciary liability | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Terminal Wealth As a Fiduciary Prudence Metric: Why ERISA Plan Fiduciaries Should Incorporate Wealth Preservation and Capital Preservation into the Evaluation of In-Plan Annuities and Alternative Investments

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC Abstract Modern portfolio construction has historically emphasized maximizing expected returns for a given level of risk. Within defined contribution plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence, Part I: Artificial Intelligence as a Fiduciary Risk/Liability Mitigation Tool Under ERISA

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC May It Please the Court: The question before this Court is not whether artificial intelligence should replace fiduciary judgment. It should not. The question is whether fiduciaries acting under the prudent … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DOL/EBSA Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-01 Is Not Entitled to Judicial Deference Under The Loper Bright Decision

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC In DOL/EBSA Field Assitance Bulletin 2026-01 (FAB 2026-01), the Department of Labor states its belief that its proposed legislation is entitled to legal deference. Nothing could be further from the truth. … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Terminal Wealth: The True Fiduciary Prudence Paradigm with Regard to the In-Plan Annuity Scam

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC A sound evaluation of fiduciary prudence must ultimately be anchored in outcomes, not just process—and in the context of long-term financial decision-making, the most meaningful outcome is terminal wealth. Fiduciaries are … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When Income Is Not Enough: Why the Continued Inclusion of In-Plan Annuities May Breach ERISA Duties When Compared to Capital-Preserving Income Alternatives and Strategies

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC This post provides a fiduciary prudence analysis comparing a $100,000 non-SPIA immediate annuity paying 7% annually to a rolling / laddered 10-year U.S. Treasury note strategy yielding 4%, evaluated through terminal … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Active Management Value Ratio as a Cost-Benefit Framework: Integrating AI into Fiduciary Prudence Analysis

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA®InvestSense, LLC I. Executive SummarySeveral years ago, I created a simple metric, the Active Management Value Ratio™ (AMVR). Since studies have shown that people are more visually oriented than verbally oriented, the AMVR … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fair Dinkum: A Critique of the EBSA’s Amicus Brief in Pizarro v. Home Depot

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® THESIS THE BURDEN OF PROOF ON CAUSATION PROPERLY RESTS WITH THE FIDUCIARY DUE TO ERISA’S REMEDIAL PURPOSE AND STRUCTURAL INFORMATION ASYMMETRY I. ERISA’s Remedial Purpose Requires Burden Allocation That Enables, Not Defeats, … Continue reading

Posted in fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary prudence | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Closing Argument: Humble Arithmetic, Common Sense, and Fiduciary Liability vs. In-Plan Annuities

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” – John Adams [C]onsistent with fiduciaries’ obligations to choose economically superior investments….[P]lan fiduciaries … Continue reading

Posted in ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary duties, fiduciary litigation, 401k, 401k plans, plan sponsor, plan sponsors, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2025 Fiduciary Litigation: Common Law + Common Sense?

James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® Looking at the ERISA litigation landscape for 2025, I think there are three clear-cut cases that may shape the future of ERISA litigation and ERISA itself: the ongoing litigation in the Fifth … Continue reading

Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 401klitigation, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, Annuities, consumer protection, cost efficient, cost-efficiency, defined contribution, DOL fiduciary rule, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciarylitigation, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prudence, retirement plans, risk management, SCOTUS, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment