-
Join 230 other subscribers
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- May It Please The Court: THE EBSA’s Legally Unsupported, Unfounded, and Bootstrapped Policies Create a Systemic Threat to Plan Participants and Plan Sponsors Alike and Must Be Rejected
- A Call for Senate Oversight Hearings: The Systemic Risk to Plan Sponsors and Plan Participants Created by the EBSA’s Expansive and Legally Unsupported Extrapolations of ERISA Fiduciary Principles
- DOL/EBSA Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-01 Is Not Entitled to Judicial Deference Under The Loper Bright Decision
- Fatally Flawed: Why DOL Administrative Bulletin 2026-01 Will Not, and Should Not, Withstand Judicial Scrutiny
- Terminal Wealth: The True Fiduciary Prudence Paradigm with Regard to the In-Plan Annuity Scam
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 230 other subscribers
Category Archives: fiduciary compliance
A Picture is Worth a 1,000 Words: Cost-Efficiency and the Future of 401(k) and Fiduciary Litigation
I have written posts regarding the trends in 401(k) and 403(b) fiduciary breach litigation, including Common Sense and Cost-Efficiency: Making ERISA Meaningful Again | The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules (wordpress.com) and The Active Management Value Ratio™3.0: Cost-Efficiency and Compliance With … Continue reading
Common Sense and Cost-Efficiency: Making ERISA Meaningful Again
After reading the court’s opinion dismissing the Intel 401(k) action, two things immediately came to mind: (1) the brilliance of the First Circuit’s Brotherston decision, and (2) how increasingly some of the dismissals of 401(k) actions seem to be more … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
1 Comment
The Active Management Value Ratio™3.0: Cost-Efficiency and Compliance With Securities AND ERISA Regulations
FINRA’s current suitability standard is found in Rule 2111 (Rule). The Rule essentially sets up a three-part suitability analysis that broker-dealers and registered representatives must conduct before recommending investment products and/or strategies to the public. The two key standards contained … Continue reading
DIY Investor and Fiduciary Protection Strategies: 4Q 2020 401(k) Top Ten AMVR Analysis
For the first new blog post since our blog and domain name were recovered, I figured it was only appropriate to re-christen the blog with our popular quarterly “cheat sheet” of the top non-index mutual funds in U.S. 401(k) plans. … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
Leave a comment
Winds of Change
I recently posted on both Twitter and LinkedIn my belief that plan participants should never lose a properly vetted 401(k)/403(b) fiduciary breach action. As expected, the posts drew a strong response. I recently participated in a private conference to discuss … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
1 Comment
Q3 2020 AMVR/InvestSense Quotient “Cheat Sheet”
The quarterly AMVR/InvestSense Quotient “cheat sheet” analyzes the non-index mutual funds in the top ten mutual funds used in U.S. 401(k) plans, based upon the Top 100 list compiled annually by “Pensions and Investments.” For the 3Q 2020, only six … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance
1 Comment
The CareerBuilder 401(k) Decision: Three Key Lessons for Plan Sponsors and ERISA Attorneys
“If we desire respect for the law we must first make the law respectful.” Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandies Currently, we have different federal courts handing down various interpretations of ERISA. As a result, in some cases the public’s guaranteed … Continue reading
Posted in 401k compliance, 401k investments, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, cost consciousness, cost efficient, cost-efficiency, ERISA, ERISA litigation, evidence based investing, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans
1 Comment
Plan Sponsor Special Report: 401(k) Fiduciary Liability Risk Management in a Post-Brotherston World
My firm, InvestSense, provides fiduciary oversight services to pension plans, trust, and other investment fiduciaries. One of the most requested services is a fiduciary audit, including a forensic fiduciary prudence analysis of the entity’s investments. After a recent audit, the … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 404c, 404c compliance, closet index funds, compliance, cost consciousness, cost efficient, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, investments, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans, risk management, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 404c, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, prudence, retirement plans, RIA risk management, risk management, wealth preservation
2 Comments
4Q 2019 AMVR Cost-Efficiency Analysis
I apologize for the delay in posting the 4Q 2019 AMVR Cost-Efficiency Analysis. I have been involved in a legal battle involving my investor advocacy/education blog, “CommonSense InvestSense.” Fortunately, the matter has been resolved and the blog is back online. … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, closet index funds, compliance, consumer protection, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, investments, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans, RIA, RIA Compliance, risk management, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, investment advisers, investment analysis tools, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans, RIA, wealth management, wealth preservation
Leave a comment
“Petition Denied”: Fiduciary Investing After Brotherston
On January 13, 2020, SCOTUS officially denied Putnam Investment, LLC’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Brotherston v. Putnam Investments, LLC. The First Circuit had ruled that plan sponsors have the … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, closet index funds, clsoet index funds, compliance, cost consciousness, cost efficient, cost-efficiency, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, financial planning, investment advisers, investments, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans, risk management, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, financial planning, investment advisers, investment analysis tools, pension plans, wealth management, wealth preservation
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.