-
Join 230 other subscribers
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence, Part I: Artificial Intelligence as a Fiduciary Risk/Liability Mitigation Tool Under ERISA
- May It Please the Court: Closing Argument On Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure Under ERISA Section 404(a) and Section 78(3) of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts
- Who’s Overseeing the DOL and EBSA? DOL FAB 2026-01’s Fatal Flaw Is Actually a Fiduciary Trap for Unwary Plan Sponsors
- May It Please The Court: THE EBSA’s Legally Unsupported, Unfounded, and Bootstrapped Policies Create a Systemic Threat to Plan Participants and Plan Sponsors Alike and Must Be Rejected
- A Call for Senate Oversight Hearings: The Systemic Risk to Plan Sponsors and Plan Participants Created by the EBSA’s Expansive and Legally Unsupported Extrapolations of ERISA Fiduciary Principles
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 230 other subscribers
Category Archives: fiduciary prudence, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, ERISA, fiduciary litigation
Battle of the Best Interests – Whose Are the EBSA and the DOL Supposed to Serve, and Whose Are They Really Serving?
ThesisThe Employee Benefit Security Administration’s (EBSA) recent shift to interpreting ERISA in terms of procedural prudence to the exclusion of substantive trust law is inconsistent with the stated purpopse and goals of ERISA, as revealed in the Act’s legislative history, … Continue reading
Posted in fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, ERISA, fiduciary litigation
Tagged 401k, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary litigation, plan sponsor, retirement plans
Leave a comment
The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules 