-
Join 235 other subscribers
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- The DOL’s Pizarro v. Home Depot Amicus Brief: Borzi and Gomez Don’t Live Here @ EBSA Anymore
- DOL’s Betrayal of American Workers Sends a Clear Message to American Workers: We Really Don’t Give a Damn About You!
- Implications of Section 78(3) of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts and the Expanding “Knew or Should Have Known” Liability Standard in the Era of AI
- Closing Argument: Humble Arithmetic, Common Sense, and Fiduciary Liability vs. In-Plan Annuities
- Closing Argument: Humble Arithmetic, Common Sense, and Fiduciary Responsibility vs. In-Plan Annuities
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 235 other subscribers
Category Archives: ERISA litigation
Deja Vu All Over Again?: Is the Annuity Industry Serving a Second Round of Annuity Misrepresentations Kool-Aid?
Bradley Campbell of Faegre Drinker recently commented on the unusual strength of the language in the Fifth Circuit’s “Memorandum Opinion and Order” staying the DOL’s Retirement Security Rule.1 Given distristrict court Chief Judge Lynn’s earlier well-reasoned analysis and opinion in … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k risk management, Annuities, best interest, compliance, Conflicts of Interest, consumer protection, DOL, DOL fiduciary rule, DOL fiduciary standard, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, fiduciary prudence, investment advisers, investments, IRA, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, retirement plans, SCOTUS
Tagged Annuities, compliance, Conflicts of Interest, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary law, Fiduciary litigation, retirement plans, Retirement Security Rule, wealth management
Leave a comment
ERISA at the Crossroads?: An Analysis of the 11th Circuit’s Home Depot Decision
I recently posted my initial impressions on the 11th Circuit’s Decision in the Pizarro v. Home Depot 401(k) case: It should be noted that the court granted HD summary judgment even though the court found that there were significant issues … Continue reading
Initial Thoughts on 11th Circuit’s Decision in Pizarro v. Home Depot
The 11th Circuit recently released its much anticipated decision in Pizarro v. Home Depot. The case is significant since it involves the question of which party has the burden of proof on the issue of causation in ERISA litigation. There … Continue reading
Fiduciary Prudence – Don’t Make the Process Harder Than It Is!
“Don’t make the process harder than it is.” – Jack Welch, former GE CEO When I meet with a prospective client, this is what I always tell them. Then I show them how their current plan is exposing them to … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, Annuities, asset allocation, compliance, consumer protection, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, Cost_Efficiency, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, investments, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prudence, risk management, securities compliance, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 404c compliance, compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary oversight, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, investment advisers
Leave a comment
Bugielski v. AT&T Services, Inc.: Another Key Case Toward Defining the Future of 401(k) Litigation
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® SCOTUS may soon have yet another ERISA-related case to review. AT&T Services, Inc. recently petitioned SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bugielski v. AT&T Services, … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k litigation, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, compliance, defined contribution, DOL, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciary standard, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prohibited transactions, retirement plans, SCOTUS
Tagged 401k compliance, 401k litigation, 401k plans, defined contribution, ERISA compliance, ERISA litigation, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciarylitigation, plan sponsors
Leave a comment
An Accident Waiting to Happen: Annuities, Spreads, and Fiduciary Liability
By James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP Board Emeritus™, AWMA® [A] fiduciary shall discharge that person’s duties with respect to the plan solely in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries; for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, Annuities, compliance, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, defined contribution, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 401k fiduciary, 403b, Annuities, compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary responsibilities, fiduciary risk management, fiduciaryprudence, retirement plans
Leave a comment
Thinking in Bets: Using Behavioral Psychology to Improve Fiduciary Prudence
By James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP Board Emeritus™, AWMA® My decision to transition into fiduciary risk management was based largely on my love of the law and psychology. My minor in college was psychology, with a focus on cognitive … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, Annuities, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, defined contribution, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, retirement plans, risk management
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 401k risk management, 404c compliance, compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary responsibility, investment advisers, retirement plans, risk management
1 Comment
Trust, But Verify: Protecting Against Investment Consultants’ Inherent Conflicts of Interest
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® The courts have consistently recognized the inherent conflict of interest that exists in the investment industry between investment advisers/consult and clients: “In this conflict of interest, the law wisely interposes. It acts … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, Active Management Value Ratio, cost-efficiency, Cost_Efficiency, defined contribution, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, investment advisers, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prudence, retirement plans, risk management
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary duty, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary loyalty, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, litigation
1 Comment
The Fiduciary Prudence Ratio™: Quantifying Fiduciary Prudence and the Quality of Investment Advice
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® Most pension plans use mutual funds as the primary investment options within their plan. The Restatement of Trusts (Restatement) states that fiduciaries should carefully compare the costs and risks associated with a … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, AMVR, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, defined contribution, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan sponsors, prudence
Tagged 401k, 401k litigation, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibilities, fiduciary risk management, fiduciarylitigation, retirement plans
Leave a comment
A Curious Paradox: “Meaningful Benchmarks,” Fiduciary Prudence, and the Active Management Value Ratio
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing has happened.Winston Churchill Some courts continue to attempt to justify premature dismissals of … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, best interest, closet index funds, compliance, consumer protection, cost consciousness, cost-efficiency, defined contribution, DOL, ERISA, ERISA litigation, evidence based investing, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciary standard, investments, Mutual funds, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prudence, retirement plans, risk management, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, trust realtionships, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 404c compliance, compliance, defined contribution, ERISA, fiducairy risk management, fiduciary, fiduciary duty, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary loyalty, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciarylitigation, investment advisers, plansponsors, retirement plans
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.