-
Join 234 other subscribers
Archives
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Much Ado About Nothing?: The DOL’s New Alternative Investment Rule vs. the Administrative Procedure Act
- Reasserting ERISA’s Private Enforcement Design: A Rebuttal to EBSA’s “Frivolous Litigation” Narrative
- When Income Is Not Enough: Why the Continued Inclusion of In-Plan Annuities May Breach ERISA Duties When Compared to Capital-Preserving Income Alternatives and Strategies
- The Active Management Value Ratio as a Cost-Benefit Framework: Integrating AI into Fiduciary Prudence Analysis
- Battle of the Best Interests – Whose Are the EBSA and the DOL Supposed to Serve, and Whose Are They Really Serving?
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 234 other subscribers
Monthly Archives: December 2017
Fiduciary Litigation 2018: A Pure Heart and an Empty Head Are No Defense
After my recent post, “Are We At A ‘Tipping Point’ in ERISA Fiduciary Litigation,” I received a number of calls and emails from legal colleagues and investment professionals who wanted to discuss the points I raised. In the post, I … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 403b, 404c, closet index funds, cost consciousness, DOL fiduciary rule, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, financial planning, Impartial Conduct Standards, investment advisers, investments, pension plans, prudence, retirement plans
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 403b, 404c, 404c compliance, Active Management Value Ratio, AMVR, best interests, compliance, Compliance Gauntlet, DOL fiduciary rule, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, pension plans, retirement plans, risk management, wealth management
Leave a comment
The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules 