-
Join 235 other subscribers
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- The DOL’s Pizarro v. Home Depot Amicus Brief: Borzi and Gomez Don’t Live Here @ EBSA Anymore
- DOL’s Betrayal of American Workers Sends a Clear Message to American Workers: We Really Don’t Give a Damn About You!
- Implications of Section 78(3) of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts and the Expanding “Knew or Should Have Known” Liability Standard in the Era of AI
- Closing Argument: Humble Arithmetic, Common Sense, and Fiduciary Liability vs. In-Plan Annuities
- Closing Argument: Humble Arithmetic, Common Sense, and Fiduciary Responsibility vs. In-Plan Annuities
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 235 other subscribers
Category Archives: prohibited transactions
Chief Judge of the 5th Circuit Calls Out His Brethren on Decision to Stay the DOL’s Retirement Security Rule
Congress passed ERISA in 1974 as a “comprehensive statute designed to promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in employer benefit plans.”1 The past fifty years has seen significant changes in the market and in the number and types … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 401k litigation, 401k plan design, 401k plans, 401k risk management, Annuities, Conflicts of Interest, consumer protection, DOL, DOL fiduciary standard, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary duty, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary standard, investment advisers, IRA, IRAs, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prohibited transactions, wealth management
Tagged compliance, DOL rule, ERISA, fiduciary, fiduciary law, Fiduciary litigation, Retirement Security Rule
Leave a comment
Bugielski v. AT&T Services, Inc.: Another Key Case Toward Defining the Future of 401(k) Litigation
James W. Watkins, III, J.D., CFP EmeritusTM, AWMA® SCOTUS may soon have yet another ERISA-related case to review. AT&T Services, Inc. recently petitioned SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bugielski v. AT&T Services, … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k litigation, 401k plans, 401k risk management, 403b, compliance, defined contribution, DOL, ERISA, ERISA litigation, fiduciary, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciary liability, Fiduciary prudence, fiduciary prudence, fiduciary responsibility, fiduciary risk management, fiduciary standard, pension plans, plan advisers, plan sponsors, prohibited transactions, retirement plans, SCOTUS
Tagged 401k compliance, 401k litigation, 401k plans, defined contribution, ERISA compliance, ERISA litigation, fiduciary law, fiduciary liability, fiduciarylitigation, plan sponsors
Leave a comment
The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules 