-
Join 234 other subscribers
Archives
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Reasserting ERISA’s Private Enforcement Design: A Rebuttal to EBSA’s “Frivolous Litigation” Narrative
- When Income Is Not Enough: Why the Continued Inclusion of In-Plan Annuities May Breach ERISA Duties When Compared to Capital-Preserving Income Alternatives and Strategies
- The Active Management Value Ratio as a Cost-Benefit Framework: Integrating AI into Fiduciary Prudence Analysis
- Battle of the Best Interests – Whose Are the EBSA and the DOL Supposed to Serve, and Whose Are They Really Serving?
- Guest Article On Supreme Court’s Decision to Hear the Intel Case
The Prudent Investment Adviser Rules
-
Join 234 other subscribers
Monthly Archives: December 2015
Combining the Active Management Value Ratio 2.0™ and the Active Expense Ratio – A More Meaningful Evaluation of Fiduciary Prudence
“The two variables that do the best job in predicting [a mutual fund’s] performance are expense ratios and turnover.”- Burton Malkiel, “A Random Walk Down Wall Street” Registered investment advisers and their representatives are fiduciaries. The courts have consistently held … Continue reading
Posted in 401k, 401k compliance, 401k investments, 404c, 404c compliance, evidence based investing, fiduciary compliance, fiduciary law, investments, pension plans, retirement plans, wealth management, wealth preservation
Tagged 401k, 401k compliance, 404c compliance, asset allocation, ERISA, evidence based investing, fiduciary, fiduciary investing, fiduciary law, investment advisers, investment analysis tools, pension plans, portfolio optimization, RIA, RIA compliance, suitability, wealth management, wealth preservation
Leave a comment
The Prudent Investment Fiduciary Rules 